Search for: "Church v. Bell"
Results 21 - 40
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2014, 5:30 am
CLS Bank: Claims Invalid Under Section 101 http://t.co/l7VlN6H93j -> Anti-spam law will hurt small biz – Advisor.ca http://t.co/PC8zM5etra -> Businesses scramble as anti-spam law draws near http://t.co/O5wXUD6ZGK -> How Canada’s New Anti-Spam Legislation Will Impact Presbyterian Churches https://t.co/mgME6qX8jf -> Dunnes Loses Copyright Case in EU High Court https://t.co/iDRPkfw29n -> [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:46 pm
Cellco Partnership v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:51 am
CSX Corp., et al. and West Lumberton Baptist Church, et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:57 am
Bell Canada, [2002] and Public Service Alliance of Canada v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
Alford, (8th Cir., Feb. 8, 2017), the 8th Circuit concluded that the mailroom's withholding of publications from the Church of Jesus Christ Christian, classified as a security threat/ terrorist group, did not substantially burden an inmate's religious exercise.In Vasquez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:43 am
LEXIS 24663, Feb. 5, 2015) and dismissed an inmate's complaint that his free exercise and equal protection rights were infringed when he was reassigned and disciplined for not attending a scheduled church call-out for inmate ministers.In Addis v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:00 am
In South Bay Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:36 pm
In South Bay Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:05 am
Many of his positions on church-state matters would normally be taken for quite liberal; for example, he argued the recent Supreme Court case of Town of Greece v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Church v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:55 pm
Bell, 41 Ga. 183, 185-86 (1870). [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
The Court seemed to hold that in 1962, when it ruled in Engel v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:45 am
At no time did appellant accurately identify himself as Calvin Bell. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:47 am
Sounds of the past In Re All Saints Stranton [2022] ECC Dur 4, the Durham consistory court was faced with the decision of whether to retune 6th bell in addition to the other seven within the church’s ring of eight. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 3:57 pm
Taco Bell of America, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:00 am
In South Bay Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 12:51 am
In terms of our readers, the “top ten” posts on the basis of the number of page views comprised a mixture of current (2022) posts and those from as far back as 2015: 1 Church of England Parochial Fees 2022 23 November 2021 2 Principles of Canon Law and the Mind of the Anglican Communion 26 July 2022 3 Church of England Parochial Fees 2021 25 November 2021 4 Church bells and the law 13 February 2018 5 Churchyard Regulations – the practicalities of… [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:46 am
One of the cases that we examined was United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am
Removal of bells from a closed church (again) Further to the item in the round-up of14 August 2022, in Removal of bells from a closed church we have given further thought to the case of Re St James Church Kirk [2022] ECC Bla 3, for which the particular interest lies in the requirements associated with making changes to a closed church, aspects of which still fall within the faculty jurisdiction. [read post]
