Search for: "Ciara Torres-Spelliscy"
Results 81 - 100
of 141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2012, 11:46 am
This item appears in Guernica. [read post]
26 May 2012, 10:01 am
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy (Stetson) has been selected to be a member of the Board of Directors of the National Institute on Money in State Politics, which is responsible for www.followthemoney.org. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 3:07 am
(Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, State Court Report) U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:14 am
“The Bullet Democracy Dodged” by Ciara Torres-Spelliscy in the Brennan Center for Justice blog. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:02 pm
Red State Lawmakers Preempt Campaign Finance Laws in Blue Cities September 23, 2021 | Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, Stetson University College of Law and the Brennan Center for Justice Republican states with major Democratic metropolitan centers are forestalling local efforts to reform election law. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy “There is no such thing as a perfect electoral system, any more than there is a perfect political society. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:55 am
. | Montana Panel Panelists Professor Bill Marshall (UNC) | Professor Richard Pildes (NYU) Professor Richard Hasen (UC Irvine) | Professor Edward Foley (OSU) Professor Michael Kang (Emory) | Professor Ciara Torres-Spelliscy (Stetson) Professor James Lopach (Montana) | Professor Jeff Wiltse (Montana) Professor Robert Swartout (Carroll) | Allison Hayward (Center for Competitive Politics) Edwin Bender (Institute on Money in State Politics) | Andy Huff (MT Asst. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:21 am
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy argues that the per curiam opinion this term in Thompson v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 6:59 am
But The Underlying Issue Is More Complex Than It Seems (Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, Talking Points Memo) “Dissent” Isn’t Just A Supreme Court Formality, It’s An Imperative (Anastasia Boden & Elizabeth Slattery, Independent Women’s Forum) We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 6:05 am
At the Brennan Center, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy examines how political donations in state attorney general elections may be influencing some of the Republican attorneys general who are suing to dismantle the Affordable Care Act in California v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 3:25 am
At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy lists “14 Things We Learned About Money in Politics in 2014” and predicts that her top item – the Court’s decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
In this post, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, Counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice, discusses this unpopular decision and the ramifications for corporations and their shareholders. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Pierce, George Washington University Law School; Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, Stetson University College of Law; Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia, Penn State Law; Shelley Welton, University of Pennsylvania Law School; and Tobias Wolff, University of Pennsylvania Law School. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:00 pm
This piece appears in Guernica. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:21 pm
Here. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:02 am
” Briefly: At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy looks at Jesner v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 2:58 am
” At medium, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy discusses a petition for review filed by chocolate giant Nestlé in a case that “arose when several John Does from Cote D’Ivoire in Africa sued Nestlé for aiding and abetting their enslavement as children,” and she contends that, if “the Supreme Court takes the case and agrees with Nestlé, then these arguments could insulate all multinational corporations from answering for human rights… [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 7:24 am
Briefly: In a post at the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy discusses the cert. petition filed recently in ProtectMarriage.com-Yes on 8 v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:52 am
At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy weighs in on Kelly v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:38 am
” At ACSblog, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy laments that not “only are [the Justices] forgetting precedent from decades ago, they can’t even recall cases from the beginning of the Roberts Court—a mere eight years ago,” while in an op-ed for Reuters Elizabeth Wydra contends that “the court’s conservative majority’s rulings have . . . made it easier for big-money donors to influence elections — while making it harder for… [read post]
