Search for: "Cicairos v. Summit Logistics"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2010, 7:38 am
Summit Logistics, Inc., 133 Cal.App.4th 949 (2005). [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 8:00 am
Summit Logistics under the principle of stare decisis. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
This case has an interesting link to Cicairos v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 3:00 am
Bufil followed Cicairos v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:08 pm
Summit Logistics, Inc. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 10:45 pm
Summit Logistics, Inc. (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 949. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Summit Logistics, Inc. (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 949, 962-963, which it discussed at length, and Bufil v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:05 pm
See Cicairos v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Summit Logistics (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 949 and Bufil v. [read post]
Brookler v. Radioshack Corporation: California Supreme Court Grants Review and Holds Pending Brinker
22 Nov 2010, 2:34 pm
The Court explained:Citing Cicairos v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:36 am
Summit Logistics, Inc. (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 949, 962-963, which it discussed at length, and Bufil v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:56 am
Summit Logistics, Inc. (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 949, which is still good law, held that an employer is obligated to ensure that employees take their meal periods. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 5:39 pm
The memo also disapproves of the Cicairos v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:00 pm
Summit Logistics, Inc. (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 949 regarding the extent of an employer's duty to make sure employees can take their lunch breaks. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am
Summit Logistics, Inc. (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 949 on grounds that Cicairos relied on a now withdrawn DLSE opinion letter and that the employer in Cicairos effectvely precluded its employees from taking their meal and rest periods. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Cicairos v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 4:59 pm
Summit Logistics, Inc. (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 949. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 2:00 pm
Summit Logistics (2005) 133 Cal.app.4th 949 and Zavala v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Summit Logistics, Inc. (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 949 would make a compelling case for Supreme Court review. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 11:01 am
One court, in Cicairos v. [read post]