Search for: "Cimino v. Long"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2011, 3:45 am
Determining eligibility for representation and indemnification of public employees being suedSalino v Cimino, 1 N.Y.3d 166 Public Officers Law Sections 17 [state officers and employees] and 18 [municipal employees] and other local laws provide for the representation and, if found liable, the indemnification, of officers and employees of the jurisdiction who are being sued -- a significant benefit to such individuals. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:59 am
Cimino, 754 So.2d 697 (Fla. 2000). [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:49 am
Byrd v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 10:11 am
In this week’s case (Singh v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Cimino v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 6:37 am
Security Insurance Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 6:37 am
Security Insurance Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Lederle Laboratories, 561 A.2d 511 (N.J. 1989), that long, long ago (but not in a galaxy that far away) Bexis helped litigate.Fortunately for the defendants in Moreno, Shackil was also a vaccine (DTP) case, and its rejection of strict liability in such cases was impossible for the plaintiff to avoid:The New Jersey Supreme Court has held that market-share liability cannot be applied to relieve a plaintiff of the obligation of identifying the manufacturer of a childhood vaccine that… [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:24 pm
[v] While this reverse selection process was created in the belief that it would encourage governments to nominate panelists to their own rosters who are independent, objective and well-qualified individuals, instead it has led to significant concerns over and delays in the selection of panelists. [read post]
