Search for: "Citibank, N.A. " Results 21 - 40 of 198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2019, 5:58 am by Fred Abrams
& UBS Bank U.S.A; Bank of America N.A.; Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.; Citibank, N.A.; HSBC Bank USA, N.A. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 11:38 am by Mark J. Levin
Citibank, N.A. that an arbitration agreement requiring individual arbitration and precluding a consumer from pursuing claims for “public” injunctive relief in court or in arbitration is unenforceable under California law. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:10 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky and Mark J. Levin
Citibank, N.A. that an arbitration agreement requiring individual arbitration and precluding a consumer from pursuing claims for “public” injunctive relief in court or in arbitration is unenforceable under California law. [read post]
In Jackson, Citibank, N.A., filed a debt-collection action against George Jackson in North Carolina state court. [read post]
29 May 2019, 12:14 pm by Seyfarth Shaw
Background In 2016, Citibank N.A. filed a debt-collection action in North Carolina state court against George W. [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:41 pm by Wystan Ackerman
Jackson, No. 1701471, the lawsuit began as a collections suit by Citibank, N.A. against George Jackson, seeking to recover for an unpaid balance on a Home Depot credit card. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Citibank, N.A. (2017) 2 Cal.5th 945, 961 [“the public injunctive relief available under the UCL [and] the CLRA . . . is primarily ‘for the benefit of the general public’ . . . [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Income Fund, L.P. v Citibank, N.A., 84 AD3d 588, 589 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:07 pm by Darren S. Teshima
National Bank Association, and Citibank, N.A. alleging breach of contract, violation of the Streit Act, and violation of the Trust Indenture Act for allegedly failing to carry out their duties as trustees. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Citibank N.A., [1987] A.C. 730 (P.C.), which reviewed various relevant authorities as obiter dicta but confirmed the requirement for special or extraordinary circumstances. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Nor, said the Appellate Division, was Nobile's parol evidence, offered to show that the parties did not intend to be bound by the stipulation until the Superintendent had signed it, admissible to add to or vary the terms of the writing.As Nobile's agreement to retire was irrevocable, and he understood its consequences, his change of mind is not a cause sufficient to set aside his agreement to the stipulation  (see Barclay v Citibank, N.A., 136 AD3d 551, lv to… [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Nor, said the Appellate Division, was Nobile's parol evidence, offered to show that the parties did not intend to be bound by the stipulation until the Superintendent had signed it, admissible to add to or vary the terms of the writing.As Nobile's agreement to retire was irrevocable, and he understood its consequences, his change of mind is not a cause sufficient to set aside his agreement to the stipulation  (see Barclay v Citibank, N.A., 136 AD3d 551, lv to… [read post]