Search for: "Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v Abraham"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2018, 4:23 am
The “agreement” at the core of an account stated is independent of the underlying obligation between the parties (see Citibank [South Dakota], N.A. v Abraham, 138 AD3d at 1056; Citibank [S.D.] [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:19 am
The “agreement” at the core of an account stated is independent of the underlying obligation between the parties (see Citibank [South Dakota], N.A. v Abraham, 138 AD3d at 1056; Citibank [S.D.] [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
“An account stated is an agreement between parties, based upon their prior transactions, with respect to the correctness of the account items and the specific balance due” (Citibank [South Dakota], N.A. v Abraham, 138 AD3d 1053, 1056; see Michael B. [read post]
