Search for: "Cities Service Company, Plaintiff-appellee-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellant-appellee" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
The judge ruled for both the claim of the Plaintiff and the counterclaim of the Defendant and denied any damages to either party. _______________________________________________________ In another June 2023 decision in Munoz v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
Pennsylvania is a comparative negligence state so contributory negligence by the plaintiffs would not be a bar to recovery. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm by Bona Law PC
Brief of the United States and the Federal Trade Commission as Amici Curiae Supporting Plaintiffs-Appellees, Teladoc, Inc. v Texas Medical Board, No. 16-50017 (5th Cir. filed Sept. 9, 2016). [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm by Wolfgang Demino
In fact, FIA was created by Bank of America (holding company) to consolidate its credit card operations in a Delaware-located national bank. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.NAPSTER, INC., Defendant-Appellant.JERRY LEIBER, individually and doing business as, JERRY LEIBER MUSIC; MIKE STOLLER and FRANK MUSIC CORP., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.NAPSTER, INC., Defendant-Appellant. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
Available at: http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol92/iss2/12 Madden v Midland involved debt that was not only in delinquent, but already charged off by the original creditor (FIA Card Services p/k/a Bank of America, N.A.). [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
Available at: http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol92/iss2/12 Madden v Midland involved debt that was not only in delinquent, but already charged off by the original creditor (FIA Card Services p/k/a Bank of America, N.A.). [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:00 pm by WIMS
" The Second Circuit Appeals Court ruled that, "We hold that: (1) Plaintiffs-Appellants' claims do not present non-justiciable political questions; (2) Plaintiffs-Appellants have standing to bring their claims; (3) Plaintiffs-Appellants state claims under the federal common law of nuisance; (4) Plaintiffs-Appellants' claims are not displaced; and (5) the discretionary function exception does… [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
Plaintiff-appellant Stephanie Williams filed the instant civil rights action on behalf of Terrance Williams, Jr., against defendants-appellees the City of Grosse Pointe Park and Officer Michael Miller of the Grosse Pointe Park Police Department. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 1:23 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITConstitutional LawDNA Act Does Not Violate Fourth Amendment When Applied to Convicted Felons Sentenced to Probation United States of America, appellee v. [read post]