Search for: "Citizens Acting For Responsible Education v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2014, 8:30 pm
The Supreme Court has ruled that public employees who testify truthfully in court outside the scope of their job responsibilities cannot be disciplined under the First Amendment. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:24 pm
The Court’s citation to Haig v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
New voter suppression laws work through state legislatures; and for the first time in six decades, Congressional district lines are being redrawn without federal limits set by the Voting Rights Act because of a closely divided Supreme Court decision. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:46 am
A challenge to the provisions was successful in the Ontario Superior Court; however, that decision was overturned by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm
Becerra (Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEA); Healthcare) United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am
Mulkey (and indeed to the odd disposition of the Supreme Court in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Justice Barrett, writing for the Court, noted that the Court’s state action jurisprudence has largely focused upon “whether a nominally private person has engaged in state action,” not whether a state official had acted as a private citizen rather than a state actor. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 9:14 am
In Garcetti v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 10:48 am
In August last year, the Kerala High Court [Venu v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:07 am
These are the first decisions in a wave of closely watched litigation challenges in California following the California Supreme Court’s August 2017 opinion in Cannabis Coalition v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:50 am
Furthermore, the legal precedent set by the Supreme Court case Gideon v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 8:15 pm
United States Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote on behalf of the Court in the case of Troxel v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
Pierce County, supra.The Supreme Court went on to explain that[d]issatisfied with the County's disclosures, Nissen sued the County in Thurston County Superior Court. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
But in view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 12:52 pm
For the time being, the map adopted by the North Carolina Superior Court remains operative for 2022 elections. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada discussed the Act in Dagg v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am
Question: Your title (like mine) comes from the Supreme Court’s 1968 opinion in Tinker v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
(A135892; nonpublished opinion; San Mateo County Superior Court; CIV508656.) [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
Argued October 12, 1993 -- Decided May 26, 1994On certification to the Superior Court, Law Division, Middlesex County.Simon Louis Rosenbach, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Robert W. [read post]
