Search for: "Citizens Corporation v. Edwards" Results 41 - 60 of 152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2014, 4:11 am by Amy Howe
Tooker, the challenge to Iowa’s ban on corporate campaign contributions. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 3:33 am by NCC Staff
On August 7, Edward Siskel, Chicago’s corporate counsel, sued Sessions in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois about new conditions placed on a Justice Department grant application for the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The family made a formal complaint to the BBC in May 2023, asking the corporation to stop the behaviour towards their child, now 20. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 6:27 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Sunday, March 17, 2019 Tags: Accountable Capitalism Act, Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:33 am by Andres
The Court of Justice of the European Union has produced a landmark decision in Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (C‑362/14). [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Edwards on behalf of the estate of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors was heard on 25th July. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am by Robert Chesney
  For those who do not have time, the short version is that the court rejected three distinct arguments: that the government violated Edwards by questioning the defendant without counsel present in the aftermath of his capture, that the defendants’ trio of subsequent written waivers of his Miranda and prompt-presentment rights were invalid, and that the government violated the 5th and 6th amendments by preventing defendant’s counsel from locating him after his capture. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:37 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The problem was based on United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:45 am by Gordon Todd
Much is poured into the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 6:05 am
Kim, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Wednesday, October 12, 2016 Tags: Antitrust, Asset management, Banks, Boards of Directors, Executive Compensation, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Financial technology, Mergers & acquisitions, Securities regulation, Shareholder activism, Shareholder value The “Reasonable Investor” of Federal Securities Law Posted by Amanda Rose, Vanderbilt Law School, on Thursday, October 13, 2016 Tags: Class actions, Common-law claims,… [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:38 am by Liam Thornton
In T.D. v Ireland [2001] 4 I.R 259, Murphy J. stated (at p. 316) that there is no constitutional obligation on Ireland to provide “any other form of socio-economic benefit for any of its citizens, however needy or deserving. [read post]