Search for: "Citizens for More Important Things v. King County"
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2015, 10:14 am
(That is what made the Court's decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
King. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
Census Bureau)As those with authority (and the "thought leaders" that help drive their thinking) move more relentlessly to governance ideologies of data driven governance and transparency based accountability regimes, it is important to remember that every ideology tends to be applied strategically, and thus politically, to advantage those factions that make up the ruling groups of any community. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 1:40 pm
My practice covers Fresno, Tulare, Kings and sometimes (ugh) Madera counties. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:04 pm
In its simplest form, I believe the original American ideology was bound up in the protection and preservation of the customary rights and privileges of English citizens, which after independence became the foundation for the basic rights and privileges of American citizens. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 9:16 am
Ever since County of Riverside v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
At this level, the only court that has to follow the decision of a District Court is that particular judge in that particular court room (here’s an example of a King County District Court decision). [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
In Smith v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
(Grand Jury of the County of L.A.) [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
Board of Trustees and City of Hayward v. [read post]
Will the United States survive the 2016 election (and 2017 Inauguration of Donald Trump)? Continuing
22 Feb 2017, 1:13 pm
More important, I suspect, is the extent to which Americans loyal to the best vision of our Constitution, as found in the Preamble or Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech, will decide to engage in collective opposition. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Winnebago County should have alerted parents to take this roles more seriously. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 2:40 pm
” Ermini v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 12:30 pm
Click here to read more. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
And we're gonna have a thing called "Extreme vetting. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 2:40 pm
” Ermini v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
That case involved an appeal from a Kings County Surrogate’s Court proceeding for a compulsory accounting in which the validity of the petitioner’s marital status to the decedent was at issue. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Or are none of these things relevant because your job is calling balls and strikes, not statecraft? [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Exemptions Citizens for a Responsible Caltrans Decision v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Exemptions Citizens for a Responsible Caltrans Decision v. [read post]
