Search for: "Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Trump" Results 61 - 80 of 97
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2022, 10:00 am by Liz Hempowicz
Earlier this year, in a case brought by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and others, a New Mexico court disqualified a county official from holding office based on his role in trespassing at the Capitol, and for participating in the “surrounding planning, mobilization, and incitement” which caused the insurrection. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am by Steve Gottlieb
Harris Cooperation Coporate responsibility Corporate responsibility Corporate responsibility corporate rights Corporation for Public Broadcasting Corruption Cost of cost of Cost-benefit calculation Coups Covid 19 Crawford v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, 20-330, concerns whether business competitors of the Trump International Hotel have the right to sue the then-president under the foreign and domestic emoluments clauses. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm by Jane Chong
Three days after his inauguration, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a government accountability watchdog group, filed the first suit in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
His responsibilities include reviewing financial disclosures and writing ethics guidance for nearly 3 million federal employees. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
In response, each claimant tweeted that Fox was “a racist” and in response Fox called them each a “paedophile. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:08 am by Bernard Bell
District: American Oversight (with 74 active FOIA cases), Judicial Watch, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (“CREW”), the Center for Biological Diversity, the Democracy Forward Foundation, and ACLJ. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The Social Media Law Bulletin has posted on a matter of judicial ethics arising from the case U.S. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
In the past, shareholder activism has focused mostly on corporate-responsibility causes, such as environmental issues and pay equity between men and women as well as governance like executive pay. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Still others may feel emotionally unable to pull the trigger on a deadly weapon, even when doing so would be ethically proper. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
It is sponsored by the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics & Loyola University Chicago School of Law. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Mark A. Graber
Citizens  Committee for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which litigated the Griffin case with assistance from prominent law firms in Washington, D.C. and New Mexico, and other public interest associations, is likely to bring lawsuits against other officeholders “leagued” in some way with the insurgents who invaded the Capitol grounds and building. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Walters, Capturing the Regulatory Agenda: An Empirical Study of Agency Responsiveness to Rulemaking Petitions, 43 HARV. [read post]
To many in Washington, the rise of China and the revanchism of Russia herald the return of great power competition. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
Accordingly, the Court directed the State to take down the banners and prohibited the public placement of any additional banners containing personal data of individuals without authority of law.United StatesCitizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. [read post]