Search for: "Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Trump" Results 61 - 80 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
It is sponsored by the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics & Loyola University Chicago School of Law. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
But a-lurching we must go.It is with that in mind that I read through President trump's State of the Union Address, and the response by Georgia Democrat Stacey Abrams. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The Social Media Law Bulletin has posted on a matter of judicial ethics arising from the case U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am by Edith Roberts
” At the George Washington Law Review’s Notice and Comment blog, Anita Sinha responds to the court’s decision in the entry-ban case, Trump v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am by Carrie Cordero, Quinta Jurecic
“The pressure Trump faced as he signed the order resembled the global reaction last year to his travel ban targeting several Muslim-majority countries,” wrote the Washington Post. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 5:21 am by Jonathan H. Adler
For this reason, a good-government activist group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), filed suit against the President on his first day in office alleging the President's business arrangements violate the Constitution. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
According to Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Kobach may have broken conflict of interest law by writing a (wildly inaccurate) paid article on voter fraud for Breitbart, which he then used for his commission’s work. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 2:20 pm by NCC Staff
The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (or CREW) believes President Trump has violated the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses of the Constitution due to his failure to divest his business holdings in Trump hotels and other private enterprises. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:55 pm by Emma Kohse, Benjamin Wittes
” Written by Barry Berke of the law firm of Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, Noah Bookbinder of  Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), and Brookings Senior Fellow Norm Eisen, the lengthy document makes the case that: There are significant questions as to whether President Trump obstructed justice. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:55 pm by Emma Kohse, Benjamin Wittes
” Written by Barry Berke of the law firm of Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, Noah Bookbinder of  Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), and Brookings Senior Fellow Norm Eisen, the lengthy document makes the case that: There are significant questions as to whether President Trump obstructed justice. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 11:40 am by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman
Days after President Trump’s inauguration in January 2017, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) brought suit against the president under the foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:34 pm by Bernie Burk
  The Trump Administration has distinguished itself throughout its brief duration as an unusually unruly and venomous collection of scorpions in a jar even by Washington standards. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 3:57 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The order is in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit brought by the National Security Archive, together with the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University and the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW). [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
 There is a post about the decision on the Panopticon blog which says that the decision shows that ‘privacy can trump expression, even with open-source data. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm by Jane Chong
Three days after his inauguration, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a government accountability watchdog group, filed the first suit in the Southern District of New York. [read post]