Search for: "Citizens for Responsibility v. Federal Election Committee"
Results 21 - 40
of 401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2010, 11:12 am
” The jurisdictional statement in Republican National Committee, et al., v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 10:43 am
FEC and – less than a year ago – invalidated limits Congress placed on the overall amount that individuals may spend in a two-year federal election cycle in McCutcheon v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm
Supreme Court in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:38 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In McGrain v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 9:23 am
While PACs have been around since the 1940s, they have proliferated since the US Supreme Court released Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 11:42 am
Valeo, recognizing an individual’s right to spend money on elections, not Citizens United, which is responsible for the emergence of Super PACs. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 10:00 am
Earlier this year, in a case brought by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and others, a New Mexico court disqualified a county official from holding office based on his role in trespassing at the Capitol, and for participating in the “surrounding planning, mobilization, and incitement” which caused the insurrection. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:46 pm
Federal Election Commission, 08-205). [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 7:04 pm
It's also triggered a response from Congress, with Senate Rules Committee Chair Dianne Feinstein issuing this press release and letter to the EAC demanding answers on why it failed to notify election officials on the problems with Ciber.- ... including source code and ballot design. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 11:53 am
Federal Election Commission. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
In the 1986 case Moore v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 10:41 am
The relevant question is whether Citizens United and its aftermath (namely, the decision in SpeechNow from the DC Circuit, and two FEC rulings) is responsible for the explosion of outside money since Citizens United. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:47 am
Federal Election Commission. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
After Bush v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:20 am
Watkins v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
Mouat (1888) and United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
In 2010, the same Supreme Court majority struck down the longstanding ban on corporate expenditures in federal elections in the Citizens United decision. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:11 pm
It has been nearly four years since the Supreme Court set off a constitutional revolution in the financing of federal elections, in Citizens United v. [read post]
