Search for: "Citizens for Responsibility v. Federal Election Committee" Results 81 - 100 of 401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2023, 8:04 pm
  Each of these conspiracies-which built on the widespread mistrust the Defendant was creating through pervasive and destabilizing lies about election fraud-targeted a bedrock function of the United States federal government: the nation's process of collecting, counting, and certifying the results of the presidential election ("the federal government function"). [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
, 394 U.S. 705 (1969) (both address constitutionality of a federal statute as applied to the defendant). [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
 Both are quite far afield from our sandbox:  Hillmaninvolved the extent to which state legal standards can be used to change listed beneficiaries on federal government workers’ life insurance policies under a statute called the Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance Act (“FEGLIA”); Arizona involved the Elections Clause, not the Supremacy Clause, of the Constitution, and concerned whether Arizona could restrict the ability of its… [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:40 pm by Matt Gluck
Nathaniel Sobel discussed the recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
In times of high stress, with much at stake, citizens and their elected officials can experience the pains of change. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm by Blogspot
The States Parties to the present Covenant, including those having responsibility for the administration of Non-Self-Governing and Trust Territories, shall promote the realization of the right of self-determination, and shall respect that right, in conformity with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
” Such partisanship and secrecy put the commission in violation of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which requires that federal commissions be transparent to the public and fairly balanced. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 1:57 am by Garry J. Wise, Wise Law Office, Toronto
The Judiciary Committee, Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties Subcommittee held a hearing on the bill last week.According to the Brennan Center for Justice, an estimated 5.3 million American citizens cannot vote because of a criminal conviction. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:23 am by Jordan Brunner
Lankford withdrew the amendment due to pushback from a number of secretaries of state with concerns that this would “federalize” the elections process. [read post]