Search for: "City & County of S. F. v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 242
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am by Beatrice Yahia
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
City of Seattle (Judicial futility doctrine and removal from state court to federal court) Two petitions for certiorari were denied on 3/20/23:Smith v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
”[18] The courts inability to fathom what Oreskes might offer was not due to any judicial disability. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 11:07 am by Arthur F. Coon
In an opinion filed on November 14, and later certified for publication on December 13, 2022, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 3) affirmed a Sonoma County Superior Court judgment upholding the EIR for a 180-unit apartment complex proposed on a 15.45-acre parcel of vacant land along the Petaluma River. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 3:03 pm by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Premier Nutrition Corp., 49 F.4th 1300 (9th Cir. 2022) (Sonner II) (same plaintiff re-filed her case in state court (Alameda County); defendant's motion to enjoin state-court proceeding was denied due to uncertainty over jurisdictional issue) Guzman v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
The case raises an interesting question of “respondeat superior” for the negligent acts by employees in the course of employment. [read post]