Search for: "City and County of San Francisco v. All Persons Interested in Proposition C" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Only Simple Majority Required (Again!): California Court of Appeal Holds SF’s Proposition G Citizen Initiative Did Not Require Supermajority Voter Approval; Reconsideration Request Pending
12 Aug 2021, 11:52 am by Lexi Louderback and Robert P. Merten III
  Because the California Supreme Court denied review of the opinion of City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
SeeSALT Blog - https://seesalt.pillsburylaw.com/
Should San Francisco Taxpayers File Protective Claims for Recovery of the Homelessness Tax and the Commercial Rents Tax?
4 Feb 2021, 1:33 pm by Craig A. Becker, Breann E. Robowski, Richard E. Nielsen, Robert P. Merten III and Connor A. Corbitt
All Persons Interested in the Matter of Proposition C (2020) 51 Cal.App.5th 703 (SF-HT); Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association et al. v. [read post]
SeeSALT Blog - https://seesalt.pillsburylaw.com/
The 5 Supermajority Tax Challenges Facing California
23 Jul 2019, 8:07 am by Robert P. Merten III and Richard E. Nielsen
Proposition C (San Francisco Nov. 6, 2018, Ballot)The San Francisco Gross Receipts Tax for Homelessness Services Initiative passed with a 61.34% vote. [read post]
SeeSALT Blog - https://seesalt.pillsburylaw.com/
Fourth District Addresses Numerous Significant CEQA Issues In Action Challenging City of San Diego’s Utility Undergrounding Projects
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 950 [my post 9/12/12 on which can be found here] and Taxpayers for Accountable School Bond Spending v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
California Court of Appeal Says Tax for “Public Safety Services” and “Other Essential Services” Not a Special Tax
11 Aug 2021, 7:28 am by Lexi Louderback and Carley Roberts
  Because the California Supreme Court denied review of City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
SeeSALT Blog - https://seesalt.pillsburylaw.com/
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
Box 2210 in San Francisco. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
The U.S. Supreme Court's Nollan/Dolan Jurisprudence Is Catching Up With The California Supreme Court in Ehrlich v. Culver City
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
By Glen C. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
New Case Involving Attorney Work Product: Coito v. Superior Court
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm by NFS Esq.
Herrera, City Attorney, (San Francisco) and Danny Chou, Chief of Complex and Special Ligation, for League of California Cities and California State Association of Counties as Amici Curiae on behalf of Real Party in Interest. [read post]
Noah F. Schwinghamer Blog - http://www.nfsesq.com/blog/
Lopsided Attorney-Client Arbitration Agreements: What if client counterclaims under the civil barratry statute? - Comment on Royston v Lopez (Tex. 2015)
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
FRANCISCO "FRANK" LOPEZ, Respondent. [read post]
ADR Law Texas - http://texas-arbitration-case-law.blogspot.com/
Chapter 14 ( The States and the People; Popular Referenda): From "Elements of Law" to "Introduction to the Law and Legal System of the United States"--Building an Introductory Course to the Legal Curriculum for the 21st Century
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
”Ibid.Soon after Amendment 2 was adopted, this litigation to declare its invalidity and enjoin its enforcement was commenced in the District Court for the City and County of Denver. [read post]
Law at the End of the Day - http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/
Summary: The Supreme Court Rules in Carpenter v. United States
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am by Sabrina McCubbin
Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco, he notes that the court has recognized that the amendment’s purpose “is to safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by governmental officials. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
HIPAA Does Not Preempt State Litigation Practice
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
Campbell, 500 P.2d 21, 33-34 (Kan. 1972); City & County of San Francisco v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
New California Case Affects Recovery of Medical Bills
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am by stevemehta
Kemp and Dan C. [read post]
Mediation Matters - http://stevemehta.wordpress.com