Search for: "City and County of San Francisco v. State of California (1978)"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2018, 4:32 am
The case is being litigated on behalf of the People by the County of Santa Clara, the City and County of San Francisco, the County of Alameda, the City of Oakland, the City of San Diego, the County of Los Angeles, the County of Monterey, the County of San Mateo, the County of Solano, and the County of Ventura. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 7:36 pm
City & County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005) four Justices noted the ripeness rules of Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:43 pm
San Francisco Trial Lawyers Association2006 - Burton Reform in Law Award2006 - Ronald M. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005), which held that a state court’s resolution of a claim for just compensation under state law generally has preclusive effect in any subsequent federal suit. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005), which held that a state court’s resolution of a claim for just compensation under state law generally has preclusive effect in any subsequent federal suit. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987),and Dolan v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Herrera, City Attorney, (San Francisco) and Danny Chou, Chief of Complex and Special Ligation, for League of California Cities and California State Association of Counties as Amici Curiae on behalf of Real Party in Interest. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:45 pm
City and County of San Francisco a prisoner pro se claims that the city failed to provide him with adequate medical treatment constituting cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
Glendening, 709 A.2d 1230 (Md. 1988) and City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
City and County of San Francisco, 22 Cal.3d 552, 567 (1978): A single employee confronted by an employer investigating whether certain conduct deserves discipline may be too fearful or inarticulate to relate accurately the incident being investigated, or too ignorant to raise extenuating factors. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
City and County of San Francisco, 22 Cal.3d 552, 567 (1978): A single employee confronted by an employer investigating whether certain conduct deserves discipline may be too fearful or inarticulate to relate accurately the incident being investigated, or too ignorant to raise extenuating factors. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:54 am
Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523 (1963). [read post]
Discovery issues regarding statutory pre-licensure medical examination of a bus driver in California
3 Oct 2013, 10:04 am
Puerto v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:54 pm
Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco (1967) and Marshall v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
Heger Realty Corp. (1998) 64 Cal.App.4th 698, 707; City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Click Here Fulfilling sewer pact to cost city $3.5 billion. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:15 pm
Department of Transportation (DOT), and the City and County of Honolulu (City). [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523 (1967), DHS contends that the protection of children is an essential societal value and thus the interests it serves through home visits are more worthy of the public's concern than are Mother's interests in the protection of the sanctity of her home. [read post]
