Search for: "City of Berkeley v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2014, 11:25 am
City of Berkeley, Case No. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:39 am
Back Bay Spas, d/b/a/ Healthworks Fitness Center, Suffolk Superior Court No. 96-7060 (1997).] [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:22 am
(Per the Court, those cases are: (1) County of Inyo v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
City of Berkeley (2019) 31 Cal.App.5th 880. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 12:27 pm
Superior Court. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 7:26 am
"The ruling is Moreno v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
City of Berkeley, S201116. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
Superior Court (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 1, 8), while they have also reigned in the record’s scope by holding the statute does not abrogate or impliedly repeal the law of privilege. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm
City of Berkeley, et al., Supreme Ct. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:40 pm
DauscherAs we previously reported here, the California Court of Appeals decided in Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
The case is Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
City of Berkeley (2006) 38 Cal.4th 1, 6.) [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 2:38 pm
Superior Court (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1091, government’s first win in that court in this subject area in decades. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:21 am
Superior Court of Fresno County.) [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:14 am
City of West Hollywood (2008) 45 Cal.4th 116 (Cedar Fair, L.P. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 9:23 pm
UPDATE Exemptions Berkeley Hills Watershed Coalition v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
City of Berkeley); reliance upon seismic safety codes as mitigation (Oakland Heritage Alliance v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:09 am
City of Philadelphia, 812 F.2d 105, 117 & n.8 (3d Cir. 1987); White v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:35 am
City of Berkeley (2011) 193 Cal.App.4th 1329: Development standards waived under density bonus laws were not applicable to a density bonus project because Government Code section 65915 requires a local agency grant waivers or reductions of development standards that “will have the effect of physically precluding the construction of a development meeting the criteria” of the density bonus statute, and the City’s code requires the City to grant… [read post]
