Search for: "City of Birmingham v. Walker" Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
He and his partner, Christine Walker, had five sons - Clive, Trevor, Devon, Orreon & Orraine. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
He and his partner, Christine Walker, had five sons - Clive, Trevor, Devon, Orreon & Orraine. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:39 am by Adam Wagner
Although the Supreme Court won’t actually be hearing the appeal in Salford v Mullen in November, it will be hearing the appeals in the cases of Hounslow v Powell,  Leeds v Hall and Birmingham v Frisby. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm by Law Lady
BIRMINGHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF, Defendant, BIRMINGHAM, CITY OF, THE, Defendant-Appellee. 11th Circuit.Federal jurisdiction -- Torts -- Removal of state court action to federal court -- Timeliness -- Appellate court need not decide whether defendant's notice of removal was timely in instant case because any error in failing to remand case to state court on ground that notice of removal was untimely would be procedural error and would be insufficient to… [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm by NL
[para 12] On the context of s.89, the doctrine of survivorship was consistent with the way Part IV of the Housing Act 1985 worked, as described by Lord Hoffman in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm by NL
[para 12] On the context of s.89, the doctrine of survivorship was consistent with the way Part IV of the Housing Act 1985 worked, as described by Lord Hoffman in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
The field is situated immediately adjacent to the Trout Run Trail, an eight-mile public trail for bicyclists, walkers and runners that circles the city of Decorah. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
The policy of the 1980 Act (consolidated in the 1985 Act) was to permit transmission of a secure tenancy by way of succession once: see Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] 2 AC 262. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
The policy of the 1980 Act (consolidated in the 1985 Act) was to permit transmission of a secure tenancy by way of succession once: see Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] 2 AC 262. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:29 am by Rosalind English
A person who discriminated on the ground of race, as defined by the Act, could not pray in aid the fact that the ground of discrimination was one mandated by religion (R v Birmingham City Council Ex p Equal Opportunities Commission (No1) (1989) AC 1155 HL and James v Eastleigh BC (1990) 2 AC 751 HL). [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
What Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57 actually means for a public law defence to possession claims, particularly summary possession, was the subject of London Borough of Hillingdon v Collins & Another [2008] EWHC 3016 (Admin). [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
So,  Doherty (FC) (Appellant) and others v Birmingham City Council (Respondent) [2008] UK HL 57 Well, well, and once more for effect, well. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:53 am
Survivor was not successor to secure tenancy Birmingham City Council v. [read post]