Search for: "City of Indianapolis v. Armour" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2012, 8:01 am by Kelvin Lawrence
Posted by Kelvin LawrenceIn a 6-3 opinion penned by Justice Breyer, the United States Supreme Court ruled on June 4 that the City of Indianapolis did not violate the 14th Amendment's guarantee of Equal Protection by denying refunds to taxpayers who paid a special sewer assessment in a lump sum, while discharging the future obligations of taxpayers who would have paid the assessment by installments. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:15 am by Cormac Early
” And in the same paper’s Opinionator blog, Linda Greenhouse parses the tea leaves from last week’s decision in Armour v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:44 am by Calvin Massey
  In Armour v, City of Indianapolis the Supreme Court ruled that equal protection was not violated by the city's decision to treat these taxpayers unequally. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:47 am by Lyle Denniston
  Unless the state’s promise of equality actually also embraced a refund for those worse off, the differing outcomes for the taxpayers are not unconstitutional, the Court declared by a 6-3 vote in Armour, et al., v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:00 pm by Oyez Project
City of Indianapolis In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:37 am by Joshua Matz
” Ruthann Robson of the Constitutional Law Prof Blog reports on highlights from the oral argument in Armour v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:30 am by Kiran Bhat
Yesterday the Court heard arguments in Armour v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 4:49 am by Julia Zebley
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] heard oral arguments [day call, PDF] on Wednesday in Armour v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 10:55 am by Lyle Denniston
It was easy to say where Stancil was going from his opening sentence in the tax equality case of Armour, et al., v. [read post]