Search for: "City of Indianapolis v. Armour"
Results 21 - 39
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2012, 7:44 am
In Armour v, City of Indianapolis the Supreme Court ruled that equal protection was not violated by the city's decision to treat these taxpayers unequally. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:00 pm
City of Indianapolis In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 9:01 pm
Following opinions the Court will hear oral argument in Armour v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:59 pm
Image via Wikipedia The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in the case of Armour, et al., v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
City of Indianapolis. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:00 am
City of Indianapolis, 132 S. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:43 am
In Armour v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:18 am
The second case is Armour v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Unless the state’s promise of equality actually also embraced a refund for those worse off, the differing outcomes for the taxpayers are not unconstitutional, the Court declared by a 6-3 vote in Armour, et al., v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am
” Today the Court will hear arguments in Armour v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:14 am
The case, Armour, et al., v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
Briefly: Maureen Groppe of the Indianapolis Star previews Wednesday’s oral arguments in Armour v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 10:55 am
It was easy to say where Stancil was going from his opening sentence in the tax equality case of Armour, et al., v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:37 am
” Ruthann Robson of the Constitutional Law Prof Blog reports on highlights from the oral argument in Armour v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
Gallagher — application of federal Fair Housing Act to claims of “disparate impact” of city housing code enforcement on minority tenants 11-161 — Armour v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:15 am
” And in the same paper’s Opinionator blog, Linda Greenhouse parses the tea leaves from last week’s decision in Armour v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:58 am
City of Indianapolis. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition (forthcoming) Petitioner’s reply (forthcoming) Armour v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 2:09 pm
Vance v. [read post]
