Search for: "City of Lancaster v. PUC"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
See City of Lancaster, et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 1:20 pm
If both use public resources, both should pay.So it's entirely possible that the Court of Appeal is correct that the statute only says that cities can sue if a franchisee doesn't pay, whereas here, Netflix isn't a franchisee in the first place, so can't be sued even if it doesn't pay.But the PUC can definitely sue. [read post]
