Search for: "City of Los Angeles v. Adams"
Results 41 - 60
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2018, 4:04 am
The justices also dismissed as improvidently granted City of Hays v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Healthy City School District Board of Education v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:49 am
” David Savage of Los Angeles Times reports that the “Supreme Court could have a conservative majority to strike down bans on semi-automatic weapons in California and other liberal states and to decree that law-abiding Americans have a right to carry a gun in public. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 5:15 am
Additional coverage of the case, and of another grant in a “free-speech dispute involving fees charged to merchants who accept credit cards,” comes from David Savage at the Los Angeles Times. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
Savage of the Los Angeles Times, and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
” Briefly: The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times urges the justices to review Dassey v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:42 pm
” David Savage reports on the decision for the Los Angeles Times; Adam Liptak notes it for the New York Times. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 11:09 am
The Court could undermine long-standing restrictions on concealed carry in America’s major cities, leading to hundreds of thousands more guns on the streets of Los Angeles, New York, and Washington, D.C.Like Stern and Epps, I think that it's likely that the Court will overturn the Second Circuit opinion and strike down the New York City rule. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:37 am
Both David Savage of the Los Angeles Times and Warren Richey of Christian Science Monitor note that the decision represents somewhat of a departure from the Court’s recent Confrontation Clause rulings. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that in Lozman v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:12 am
The Los Angeles Times editorial board weighs in on the case, arguing that “if the 1st Amendment means anything, government officials shouldn’t be able to punish dissenters, even rude ones, by selectively subjecting them to arrest — even if the arrest might be justified on other grounds. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:09 pm
Today in City of Ontario v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
In Gill v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:43 am
” David Savage at the Los Angeles Times, Adam Liptak at the New York Times, NPRblog, and the Boston Globe have coverage of the case. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
In Foley’s view, the Jeffersonian goal underlying the Twelfth Amendment of 1804 was not merely to cure the mischief arising from the fact that electors were obligated to cast two “undifferentiated” votes for president—the great misstep that led to the Burr-Jefferson tie of 1800 and to Hamilton’s several attempts to throw votes away from John Adams. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:57 am
Palmer, who was part of the four-to-three majority ruling in favor of the city in the eminent domain case Kelo v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:24 am
Briefly: Assessing this term’s “honest services fraud” cases, an editorial today in the Los Angeles Times urges the Court to strike down the law in question on the basis that it is “vague and open-ended. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:20 am
Times chronicles the infelicitous tale behind Los Angeles County v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Debra Cassens Weiss of the ABA Journal, Tom Ramstack of AHN News (via the Gant (Pa.) [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:13 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines how the parties in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
