Search for: "City of Los Angeles v. Howard"
Results 1 - 20
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 5:48 am
” ( City of Fresno v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
" Firefighters4Freedom, a nonprofit corporation "whose mission is to support the constitutional rights of firefighters in the City of Los Angeles during the COVID-19 pandemic," sued the City of Los Angeles over the City's 2021 COVID-19 vaccine mandate for City employees. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Exemptions Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Exemptions Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
But experts say it is the president’s son-in-law, Howard Krein, who could present fresh ethical challenges for the new administration. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
” David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, however, notes that “because the grand jury operates in secret, it is unlikely the general public will see Trump’s financial records before the November election, if ever. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 4:03 am
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times the court announced that “it would not hear a closely watched case on whether cities can make it a crime for homeless people to sleep outdoors,” City of Boise, Idaho v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
of Texas at Austin 1.18 $106,598 $90,100 V&erbilt Univ. 1.19 $129,030 $108,800 Univ. of Arkansas 1.19 $61,500 $51,700 Mitchell Hamline Sch. of Law 1.21 $64,429 $53,200 Univ. of California-Los Angeles 1.26 $121,453 $96,600 Univ. of North Dakota 1.26 $61,500 $48,800 Univ. of Kansas 1.27 $66,415 $52,100 Univ. of Kentucky 1.28 $69,860 $54,400 Univ. of Mississippi 1.32 $64,300 $48,700 The Univ. … [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:20 pm
Just as one example, in the 1987 case of Florida v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:19 am
See, e.g., City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am
City of Los Angeles (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 185, there were no fluctuating EIR project descriptions, nor was there a misleadingly minimized initial project description. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am
City of Chicago (2010), the case that fully incorporated the Second Amendment. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
See also Comm’rs of Parks & Boulevards of City of Detroit v Moesta, 91 Mich 149, 152-53; 51 NW 903 (1892); In re Edward J. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
City of New London both indicate that the “for public use” portion of the Takings Clause restricts condemnations further than normal due process limits on state police power. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
In Gill v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
