Search for: "City of Los Angeles v. Public Utilities Commission"
Results 21 - 40
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on Alexander Keyssar, Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College? [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
City of Los Angeles (2022) 81 Cal.App.5th 657 In 2010, the City of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (“LADWP”), and Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Board of Commissioners (collectively, “Los Angeles”) approved a set of substantively identical leases (2010 Leases) governing about 6,100 acres of land Los Angeles owns… [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
The majority further wrote: "The Board did not specifically find the natural gas pipelines to be public utilities per se, but nonetheless found that the public utility systemwide presumption should apply because the pipelines are relied on as the source of supply for public utilities. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:30 pm
City of Los Angeles (2018) 19 Cal.App.5th 465. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Solano County Airport Land Use Commission (2007) 41 Cal.4th 372, 382. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Solano County Airport Land Use Commission (2007) 41 Cal.4th 372, 382. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Instead, I consulted press accounts, Justice Department press statements, research papers, university publications, teen magazines, business publications, the Federal Trade Commission, women’s legal defense advocacy pages, U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
California State Lands Commission (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 476. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
The Commission approved t [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
Petitioner's reply Docket: 09-350 Title: Los Angeles County v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 9:23 pm
City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 473. stated, “despite [CEQA’s evident concern with protecting the environment and human health, its relevant provisions are best read to focus almost entirely on how projects affect the environment. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
WATER RIGHTS AND SUPPLY City of W. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
Public Utilities Commission; Riley v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm
City of Dublin (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 1301, 1311 (my 4/10/13 post on which can be found here); Lucas v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
City of Los Angeles (2020) 47 Cal.App.5th 368. [read post]
