Search for: "City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2018, 5:35 pm
Respondent has filed an RFO to transfer the pending proceedings to Chatsworth Division of the Los Angeles County Superior Court on the grounds specified in Code of Civil Procedure Section 397(c) and (e), and upon Section 397.5. 1. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:28 pm
(D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:32 am
Other cities and counties joined the litigation, including the City and County of San Francisco; the Cities of Oakland and San Diego; and the Counties of Alameda, Los Angeles, Monterey, San Mateo, Solano, and Ventura.In 2014, the Santa Clara County Superior Court ruled that three former lead paint manufacturers — The Sherwin-Williams Company, ConAgra Grocery Products, and NL— were liable for marketing lead paint. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:46 am
Los Angeles Cty. [read post]
10 May 2018, 12:19 pm
The capstone of the entry focused on an Los Angeles mob that led a massacre against Chinese immigrants. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:30 pm
City of Los Angeles (2018) 19 Cal.App.5th 465. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:15 pm
Neptune Township et. al, Dec. 10, 2013, Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division, Monmouth County More Blog Entries: Women Settle with Police, City for Gender Discrimination by Chief, Supervisors, Nov. 28, 2016, Los Angeles Discrimination Lawyers Blog [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:16 pm
City of Los Angeles, (BNSF Railway Company, Real Party in Interest) (2018) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
Los Angeles Conservancy v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 12:41 pm
See, City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 3:59 pm
Taking Creed-21 up on its proposal, Walmart moved to compel Creed-21 to produce its PMQ, submitting to the court a recent hearing transcript from another Los Angeles Superior Court action in which Creed-21 was also represented by Briggs. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:12 am
After hearing post-trial motions, Judge Kleinberg in January 2014 ordered three defendant companies to pay $1.15 billion, to be shared among Alameda, Los Angeles, Monterey, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano and Ventura counties, and the cities of Oakland, San Diego and San Francisco. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Gelblum, Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, Los Angeles, California; Carey R. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
City of Los Angeles (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 1396. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
City of Los Angeles (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 1396. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 11:55 am
Plaintiff then sued defendants for fraud in Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68, 81 [holding “trial court has inherent power in mandamus action to remand a matter to an administrative agency for clarification of ambiguous findings”]; Keeler v. [read post]
