Search for: "City of National City v. State of California (1983)"
Results 81 - 100
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm
(relisted after the Sept. 29 conference) National Football League v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 4:46 pm
At the request of the Ninth Circuit, the court addressed the following question: "Whether, as a matter of California law, a California county and its employees can form an implied contract that confers vested rights to health benefits on retired county employees. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SAN State of MI v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
§ 1983, alleging an excessive force claim against the officers (among other claims) and a Monell claim against the city for failure to train and discipline officers. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Guida, No. 05-6105 In death penalty habeas proceedings in a case in which petitioner effectuated a murder-for-hire against her husband, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) state courts reasonably applied Strickland by concluding that petitioner sabotaged her own defense, as counsel's performance is not deficient when counsel follows a client's instructions; 2) state courts reasonably applied Brady because even if certain letters were favorable evidence, and were… [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Massachusetts is one of the several states that bans stun guns (including Tasers) — the others are Hawaii, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin, plus the Annapolis/Baltimore area in Maryland, New Orleans, Washington, D.C., and several other cities. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
City of Carson, Cal. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 In re Sims, No. 06-0644 In an inmate's 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging excessive force, inmate's petition for writ of mandamus challenging an order requiring him to produce his mental health records is granted because: 1) a plaintiff does not forfeit the psychotherapist-patient privilege merely by asserting a claim for injuries that do not include emotional damage, or by stating that he suffers from depression or… [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
City of New York , No. 06-1983 Read more... [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
§ 1396a(a)(30)(A) based on requirements that do not appear in the statute's text.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below -- not available (9th Circuit, unpublished)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's reply Title: City of Colton v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:03 am
Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
Rptr. 342 (1983); Eastwood v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
Cohen, 337 F3d 1024, 1033-1034 [9th Cir2003] [internet domain name; applying California law]; Shmueli v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
California courts are split on whether market share liability could apply in vaccine cases. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
First up is the much anticipated City of New Haven v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Once the concept of law is understood, it becomes easier to place law within the institutional structures in which it is created, and applied--the state and its apparatus, the ordering of law in hierarchies of authority, the relationship between national and international law, and the constraining principle of rule of law. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
National Rifle Assn. of Am., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am
State Bar of California and Lathrop v. [read post]
