Search for: "City of New York v. US Dept. of Commerce"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2012, 11:18 am
This law, however, is not widely known or used and as a result, women and men in New York City are suffering needlessly. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
All of the pre-FOIA cases involved litigants’ attempted use of civil discovery to pursue their cases. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 9:05 pm
Dept. of Commerce] Unanimous decision in Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:57 am
Moreover, this case is not controlling on other courts in New York City. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
Chamber of Commerce, which then sent the money to a PAC and the Illinois Republican Party for use in Karmeier’s campaign. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
"). 6.New York City's premise residence licensing requirements "materially mirror those set forth in the Penal Law. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:45 pm
Moriarty, 106 F. 886, 891 (S.D.N.Y.1901)[2] 13 USC §195[3]Dept. of Commerce v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 6:24 am
Term, 2d Dept., 2006). [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
”[28] V. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike’s Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
City of New York framework to analyze his takings claim. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
In City of New York v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
“The president of the Two Chinese Christian Councils of Huangshi city explained to believer [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 2:13 am
Hyman, et al.Court: U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-3943 October 12, 2011 Judge: Wesley Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Tax Law Appellants sued New York City and the State, along with a number of city and state officials, challenging a tax scheme that exempted New York City residents from a tax levied on parking services rendered in Manhattan. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Zarda brought a claim in the Eastern District of New York alleging sex stereotyping in violation of Title VII and sexual orientation discrimination in violation of the New York Human Rights Law. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Partnership for New York City, Inc., amicus curiae. [read post]
