Search for: "City of Oakland v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
City of Oakland (2023) 92 Cal.App.5th 799, the First District Court of Appeal held an agreement between a developer and the City of Oakland was unenforceable to the extent it prevented the city from imposing new impact fees in the future. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 5:14 am
United States made it to the Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
United States (the anti-commandeering doctrine) and NFIB v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Cyrus Farivar
That suspect, Purvis Ellis, is the lead defendant in the case of United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:11 pm by Andrew Frisch
Since the late 1990s, the City and the collective bargaining unit for City police officers, the Oakland Police Officers’ Association, have entered into successive collective bargaining agreements. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:03 pm by Glen C. Hansen
City of Oakland, 2018 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 18822 (Case No., 15-cv-03392, Feb. 5, 2018) Fifth Amendment takings challenges to adjudicative land-use exactions and permit conditions are governed by the two-part test in Nollan v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:41 am by Holland & Hart
City of Oakland, Case No. 09-16167 (9th Cir., Nov. 19, 2010), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (which includes Nevada) held that the City could properly require an employee who had left a job within a specified period of time to reimburse the City for training costs that the City had paid in anticipation that the employee would remain employed with the City for that period of time, without violating the… [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 6:38 am by Derek Fincham
In our current digitally connected age it is easier than ever now to document and share the proliferation of art meant to protest, encourage, and criticize the current state of institutional racism in the United States and elsewhere. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 7:09 am
The City of Belmont recently passed the toughest anti-smoking law in the state. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm by Zach ZhenHe Tan
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. applied the presumption of extraterritoriality to the ATS and concluded that courts had jurisdiction only over ATS claims that “touch and concern” the territory of the United States with “sufficient force. [read post]