Search for: "City of Sacramento v. State of California"
Results 81 - 100
of 248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2008, 8:46 am
The state is building a new execution chamber.There are still more problems in California. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
Department of General Services (Joint Committee On Rules of the California State Senate and Assembly, Real Party in Interest)/Save the Capitol, Save the Trees v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:35 am
Abbott Clover Valley Foundation v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:39 am
" Doe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:28 am
California’s “primary assumption of the risk” doctrine was first set forth in Knight v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 11:33 am
Instead of applying the strict liability test, the California courts apply a reasonableness standard to these state actions. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:09 am
Sasaki, supra, 23 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1454-1457; City of Rancho Cucamonga v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 10:01 pm
City of Holtville (1969) 271 Cal.2d 816. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 405.) [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm
City of Seattle (Federal court jurisdiction) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:36 am
" (Sacramento Old City Assn. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 7:59 am
The rule of law stated in Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 7:23 am
See Richards, supra, at 820, citing Romano v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:32 pm
State Water Resources (2018) 28 Cal.App.5th 342, 359; Bridges v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 10:10 am
City of Sacramento (1970) 7 Cal.App.3d 826, 833-834. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
California Native Plant Society v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 9:08 am
California Oak Foundation v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 8:31 am
City and County of San Francisco (1953) 260 P.2d 55, 59, a California Supreme Court decision. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:34 am
As Church's claim is a state law claim for retaliation, the California Court of Appeal decision in Mamou v. [read post]
