Search for: "City of Santa Barbara v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2007, 9:31 pm
Well, now we know.)This opinion harkens back to the days of Chief Justice Traynor -- viewed by many as one of the greatest legal talents never to sit on the United States Supreme Court -- and is similarly scholarly, progressive, empirical, and informed. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Santa Rosa (Social Advocates For Youth, Real Party in Interest) (1st Dist. 2018) ___ Cal.App.5th ___, a dense 24-page opinion filed by the Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District (Division 4) on May 1, and later ordered certified for publication on May 24, 2018. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
The trial court granted the defendant’s motion on the grounds of primary assumption of the risk, but the court of appeal reversed, holding, inter alia, that triable issues of fact existed as to whether the defendant’s conduct was grossly negligent within the meaning of City of Santa Barbara v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am by Abbott & Kindermann
” Applying this principle to a measure imposing a retail sales and use tax submitted to the voters to fund transportation projects, the court in Sustainable Transportation Advocates of Santa Barbara v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm by Arthur F. Coon
County of Santa Barbara (2d Dist. 2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 1059; Mt. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:28 am by Ralph L. Jacobson
Superior Court (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1628, 1634: “…collisions with other skaters in group skating sessions, and the injuries that may result therefrom, are inherent risks of the sport of figure skating. [read post]