Search for: "City of Westminster v. District Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2015, 1:07 am
Mirga v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; Samin v Westminster City Council, heard on 6-7 March 2015. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
UKI (Kingsway) Ltd v Westminster City Council & Anor, heard 6 Nov 2018. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 1:54 pm
Assured Property Service Ltd v Ooo, County Court at Edmonton, 30 June 2017 Ms Ooo was an assured shorthold tenant of APS with a post 1 October 2015 tenancy. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council (2002) 1 AC 547, Omar v Westminster City Council (2008) HLR 36 (our report), Abed v City of Westminster (2011) EWCA Civ 1406 (our report), and Temur v Hackney LBC (2014) HLR 39 (our report) had all variously held that the facts relevant at review were those that pertained at the date of the review, not at the date of the original decision. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 am
On Thursday 11 May, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of R (Hemming (t/a Simply Pleasure Ltd) & Ors) v Westminster City Council. [read post]
Case Preview: Protect Rural England (Kent) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
27 Jan 2021, 2:30 am
The principles set out in Bolton Metropolitan District Council and others v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:26 am
Mirga v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; Samin v Westminster City Council, heard on 6-7 March 2015. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:02 am
Mirga v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; Samin v Westminster City Council, heard on 6-7 March 2015. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
UKI (Kingsway) Ltd v Westminster City Council & Anor, heard 6 Nov 2018. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm
” The City of Westminster would also provide alcohol-treatment services to Bafna-Louis. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:45 pm
That can be seen from, for example, the decision of the House of Lords in Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council (2001) UKHL 57, (2002) 1 AC 547 and, more recently, that of the Court of Appeal in Waltham Forest London Borough Council v Saleh. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 12:53 pm
Hodge v Folkestone and Hythe District Council (2023) EWCA Civ 896 A second appeal to the Court of Appeal on Folkestone’s decision that Ms Hodge as intentionally homeless because she had left a room in a hostel run by a charity that she was occupying under licence. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 3:17 am
Assange was appealing against the decision of Senior District Judge Howard Riddle in the City of Westminster Magistrates Court. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Paulette Garnett has said that defamation laws will eventually tame “the Wild West” of the internet after she dismissed a claim by blogger Charles LeBlanc that the City of Fredericton breached his rights under the Charter [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 11:00 pm
On 2 February 2010, the City of Westminster Magistrates Court ordered that he be extradited to Lithuania to face charges laid out in the arrest warrant. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
In the courts R (on the application of Gallastegui) v Westminster City Council & Ors [2012] EWHC 1123 (Admin) (27 April 2012). [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 9:32 am
Following Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire District Council (2005) HLR 1, the Circuit Judge found that it was. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:13 am
And then, on whether Waltham had implemented its own policy, the Court of Appeal found this situation was more akin to Abdikadir v London Borough of Ealing (2022) EWCA Civ 979 (our note) than Alibkhiet v London Borough of Brent v City of Westminster (2018) EWCA Civ 2742, in that the issue was a lack of evience in following the policy, rather the terms of the policy itself. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 4:22 pm
New Westminster (City of), 2001 BCSC 1516 Keen v. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
The Court of Appeal held, following Nzolameso v Westminster City Council (2015) UKSC 22 (our note), and Abdikadir v Ealing LBC (2022) EWCA Civ 979,(our note): i) Even if Ms M did not qualify for ‘zone 1’ (in borough) accommodation under Ealing’s policy, the council should have tried to secure accommodation as nearby as possible; ii) the onus was on the council to show compliance with s.208(1) where raised,. [read post]
