Search for: "City of Westminster v. District Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2015, 11:52 pm
She took Westminster to court. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 5:08 pm
Following R (Jakimaviciute) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2014] EWCA Civ 1438 [our report] and Alemi, R (on the application of) v Westminster City Council [2015] EWHC 1765 (Admin) [our report], it was not permissible to set qualifying [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 5:57 pm
In last week’s decision in R (on the application of Guardian News and Media Ltd) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2012] EWCA Civ 420 (03 April 2012), the Court of Appeal for England and Wales made this point in rhetoric of great eloquence, perspicuity and vigour (though the judgments are curiously ambivalent in their ambit and ambition). [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
Do read Marie-Andrée’s report of the decision just issued by the Southern District Court of New York (SDNY) if you want to know! [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am
Preska, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, rule [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 12 March 2012, there was a Statement in Open Court in the case of McFadden v News Group Newspapers Ltd. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
There are two varieties of court in the country, civil or escrow court (as it was termed in the days of the founding of the Constitution) and criminal court. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
On the same day the Court of Appeal (Laws LJ) dismissed a renewed application for permission to appeal in the case of Thornton v Telegraph Media Group. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:27 am
A grant of immunity would require approval from two-thirds of the congressional committee requesting testimony or a majority vote in the full House or Senate, as well as the approval of a district court judge. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am
In the Courts There is a comment on the R (Guardian News and Media) v City of Westminster Magistrates ([2010] EWHC 3376 (Admin)) on access to documents in criminal cases by Nigel Hanson of Foot Anstey on “Hold the Front Page” The UK Human Rights Blog and Nearly Legal have posts about the case of Clift v Slough Borough Council ([2010] EWCA Civ 1171). [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm
R (Guardian News and Media) v City of Westminster Magistrates [2010] EWHC 3376 (Admin) – 21 December 2010, Admin Court (Sullivan LJ and Silber J). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 am
But District Judge Howard Riddle, sitting at City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court last week, rejected his arguments and allowed tweeting, provided that it was accurate and unobtrusive. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:32 pm
Bruce V. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:36 pm
Burning the candle at more than one end and not recreational v. work either, just work of various kinds. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions In Tropeano v Karidis [2012] SADC 29 the District Court of South Australia dismissed a claim for slander, finding that the words complained of had not been spoken by the defendant. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia: In the case of Google Inc v ACCC ([2013] HCA 1) the High Court of Australia held that Google was not liable for engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct as a result of the production of sponsored links. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, is scheduled to hear a motion for preliminary approval of the record data breach settlement in the Anthem class action case. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm
There are some paragraphs of a general nature on a local authority’s responsibilities when considering or arranging out of borough (or more distant) temporary accommodation, drawing on the Supreme Court judgment in Nzolameso v Westminster City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another intervening) [2015] UKSC 22 (our report). [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:02 am
Before Brown v. [read post]
