Search for: "Civil Rights for Seniors v. Admin. Office of Courts"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2007, 1:50 pm
Just a quick note on the Admin Court decision in Gilboy, R (on the application of) v Liverpool City Council & Anor [2007] EWHC 2335 (Admin). [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:59 am
In Civil Rights for Seniors v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:43 pm
Section 18(1) Senior Courts Act 1981 specifically excludes any right of appeal to the Court of Appeal from any judgment of the High Court in “any criminal cause or matter”. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:40 am
Andrew Crosbie v Secretary of State for Defence [2011] EWHC 879 (Admin) – Read judgment The Administrative Court has ruled that the employment of an army chaplain involves a “a special bond of trust and loyalty” between employee and state such that the full panoply of fair trial rights under Article 6 could not apply. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:49 am
Ali & Anor, R (on the application of) v Minister for the Cabinet Office the Statistics Board [2012] EWHC 1943 (Admin) Article 8 challenge to 2011 census fails in High Court. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am
Home Office (Appellant) v Tariq (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 35: Home Office wins on Supreme Court appeal – No absolute requirement for claimant to know gist of case against them in civil proceedings if national secrets involved. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm
Strasbourg judges being elected, as opposed to chosen based on merit as our senior judges are (in principle at least), merit is no guarantee of victory, and so victory went to the 65-year-old civil servant. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:35 pm
For press release, see ECtHR Press Release R (SSHD) v HM Coroner for Inner West London [2010] EWHC 3098 (Admin) 30 Nov 2010. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:30 pm
Last summer, in Espinoza v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
This hurts all those companies, professionals, and other market participants who are playing by the rules and doing the right thing. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 12:48 pm
Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
BAILII: Recent Decisions Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Carboex SA v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA [2012] EWCA Civ 838 (19 June 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Entrust Pension [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 4:37 pm
The relevant tests An application for strike out under Civil Procedure Rule 3.4(2)(a) requires the Court to be ‘certain’ that the Claimant’s Particulars of Claim disclose no reasonable grounds for bringing the claim. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
At the time, each Commissioner had three counsels and, in our office, each one of us handled a third of the Enforcement recommendations. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm
For example, if you ask a state tax officer when were the assessments? [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
Reporters who cover the Court are in a tough spot. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
Even better than right – Morgan Stanley actually excelled in its response. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
Raleigh, NC 27673 Phone: (919) 733-9250; (V/TTY); (800) 821-6922 (V/TTY/Toll Free in NC only) Fax: (919) 733-9173 Pathways to the Future, Inc. 525 Mineral Springs Drive Sylva, NC 28779 Phone: (828) 631-1167(V/TTY) Fax: (828) 631-1169 E-mail: pathways@main.nc.us State ADA Coordinator Larry Jones NC Office on the ADA 217 West Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27603-1336 Phone: (919) 715-2302 (V/TTY) E-mail: Larry.Jones@ncmail.net Web:… [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
Our users include a variety of roles, from managing partners, to associate lawyers, paralegals and admin/operations team members. [read post]
