Search for: "Claiborne v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2019, 3:02 pm by Saira Hussain
United States (1969), the Supreme Court held that under the First Amendment only “true threats” may be punishable. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 11:54 pm by Steve Lubet
In the AAUP, we encounter such violations, petty and large, on a daily basis in the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But, as the United States Supreme Court has observed in a different but related context, the "inappropriate or controversial character of a statement is irrelevant to the question whether it deals with a matter of public concern. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 7:34 am by Erin Miller
Justice Stevens began his free speech work that Term by authoring the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  His successor could take a broader view of the extent to which federal law controls, which would allow fewer state-law tort suits to proceed. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:13 am by Eugene Volokh
" The First Amendment to the United States Constitution demands that we not treat such speech-based injunctions so lightly. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm by Mark Walsh
Tennessee, from the original docket, a long-running case between the two states over groundwater in the Middle Claiborne Aquifer. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 1:02 pm by Ken White
United States, it's not clear whether modern true threats analysis also requires that the defendant intended their statement to be taken as a threat, or at least was reckless about its impact. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 4:35 am by SHG
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Doe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 11:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit said in United States v. [read post]