Search for: "Claiborne v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2007, 3:07 pm
Petitioner Mario Claiborne from the case of Claiborne v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 7:09 am
This is big news for judges, prosecutors and criminal defense lawyers around the country who have been waiting for the Supreme Court to decide United States v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 10:58 am
  My friends cut-and-paste allow a quick summary from the Eighth Circuit's official opinion page:062965P.pdf   05/18/2007  United States  v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:20 pm
At Sentencing Law and Policy, Doug Berman has this post discussing the recent Sixth Circuit Valentine opinion, a vehicle for the High Court to address Booker retroactivity issues; and this post discussing whether the Court should remand Claiborne given the United States Sentencing Committee's new Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy report. [read post]
15 May 2007, 6:56 am
The applicable United States Sentencing Guidelines called for a sentence of between 210 and 262 months of imprisonment, but the district court imposed a sentence of only 72 months. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 12:25 pm
  And the penultimate substantive paragraph also has this interesting discussion of the pending SCOTUS reasonableness work (background here):We pause briefly to comment on the status of this case in light of the Supreme Court's pending decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 9:20 am
Such an extension, however, would accord such upward departures even greater protection than they had under the mandatory Guidelines.In United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 8:23 pm
United States [Duke Law case backgrounder; merit briefs], a case that could impact sentencing guidelines across the country. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 6:03 am
United States (combined preview here). [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
  There is a lot in Pickett that merits highlighting, but this paragraph may be my favorite and the most important aspect of the decision (and not just for crack cases, but for all cases):While Booker and § 3553(a) instruct sentencing courts to consider all these "multiple and vague" factors, United States v. [read post]