Search for: "Clark v. Alexander" Results 41 - 60 of 129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2013, 4:45 am by Susan Brenner
--> After a jury convicted Clark Alexander Mahoney Jr., of possessing child pornography or child erotica in violation of California Penal Code § 311.11(a), the court “granted [him] probation”. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
To take just one example, while TCRR cites Alexander Polikoff’s Waiting for Gautreaux for the fact that 65 of the 75 staff attorneys in the Civil Rights Division protested the Justice Department’s change of position in Alexander v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
To take just one example, while TCRR cites Alexander Polikoff’s Waiting for Gautreaux for the fact that 65 of the 75 staff attorneys in the Civil Rights Division protested the Justice Department’s change of position in Alexander v. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 6:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Reuben Clark Law School The Belloni Decision and Its Legacy: United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:22 am by Bill
One of the decisions I have always had a warm spot for is Mapp v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 9:15 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Clarke, WTO Subsidies Discipline During and after the CrisisPhilip Marsden & Ioannis Kokkoris, The Role of Competition and State Aid Policy in Financial and Monetary LawKern Alexander, International Regulatory Reform and Financial TaxesChapter VI Monetary RegulationErnst Baltensperger & Thomas Cottier, The Role of International Law in Monetary AffairsGary Hufbauer & Daniel Danxia Xie, Financial Stability and Monetary Policy: Need for International SurveillanceSean… [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:43 am by William Ford
United States or permitted by its ruling in Munaf v. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 7:29 am by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decision in El-Hady v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
[vi]And then-Justice Rehnquist might have joined the majority in Washington v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a threshold matter, respondent argues that the appeal must be dismissed because the November 2020 order does not constitute a final judgment (see CPLR 5701 [b] [1]; Matter of Alexander M. v Cleary, 188 AD3d 1471, 1473 [2020]; see also CPLR 5701 [a] [1]). [read post]