Search for: "Clark v. Baker" Results 21 - 40 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2018, 7:32 am by Victoria Clark
Clark posted the brief as well as other documents relating to Paracha v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 9:25 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) St George v The Home Office [2008] EWCA Civ 1068 (08 October 2008) Symbian Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents [2008] EWCA Civ 1066 (08 October 2008) Behzadi v Behzadi [2008] EWCA Civ 1070 (08 October 2008) Orchard (Developments) Holdings Plc v Reuters Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1017 (02 September 2008) JN (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1018 (02 September 2008) HJ (Iran) v… [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Instead, in Murphy v Callinan [2018] IESC 59 (30 November 2018) Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) approved and applied Collins. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 5:11 am by Anushka Limaye
Matthew Kahn posted the Oct. 1 joint unclassified filings in the Qassim v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
 First On 24 April 2015, Jeremy Baker J handed down judgment in Asghar & Mujahid v Ahmad, Ali, Bhutt and Hayat ([2015] EWHC 1118 (QB)). [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
He too considered Bonnard v Perryman and Reynolds v Malocco, as well as the hugely-influential decision of Clarke J in Cogley v RTE [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005). [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
Clarke, 2007 BCSC 1021, 35 E.T.R. (3d) 98 [Doucette]; Tomlyn v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
In Sweeny v Ireland [2017] IEHC 702 (23 November 2017) Baker J in the High Court struck down section 9(1)(b) of the Offences Against the State (Amendment) Act, 1998 (also here), which provided for a wide offence of withholding material information from Gardaí, on the grounds that it infringed the right to silence derived from the right to freedom of expression in Article 40. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 9:52 am by Victoria Clark
Victoria Clark posted two rulings in the transgender servicemember ban litigation, Doe v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
The Court of Appeal (Smith LJ presiding; Scott Baker LJ and Lord Clarke) considered the “doubles the risk” test (that is, that it had to be proven that the exposure for which Greif was responsible had more than doubled the environmental exposure) which Greif’s Counsel submitted had to be proved in order to satisfy the balance of probabilities test, . [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:31 am by Lyle Denniston
Clark — application of Confrontation Clause to a child’s out-of-court statement to a teacher about abuse Tuesday, March 3: Los Angeles v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm by Blog Editorial
Second, on 6 and 7 April 2011, Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker, Mance and Clarke will hear Jivraj v Hashwani. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 10:14 am
 Merpel disagrees: it's not possible to separate law from policy on a matter as sensitive as this, she mewses.Some further readingEleonora's katpost of 17 April on the Supreme Court's decision to refer questions to the CJEU here Katpost reporting on the Baker & McKenziie debate on whether this case represents the end of browsing as we know it here Lionel Bently's assault on the Court of Appeal decision in this case, hosted on this weblog here Simon Clark's explanation of… [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am by INFORRM
A cause of action is “a factual situation the existence of which entitles one person to obtain from the court a remedy against another person” (Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232, 242-243 (Diplock LJ); Roberts v Gill [2011] 1 AC 240, [2010] UKSC 22 (19 May 2010) [41] (Lord Collins); Murphy v O’Toole [2014] IEHC 486 (17 October 2014) [57]-[58] (Baker J); see also PR v KC [2014] IEHC 126 (11 March 2014) [36] (Baker J), but note… [read post]