Search for: "Clark v. Banks" Results 21 - 40 of 486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2023, 5:37 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include: LectureAlexis Mourre, For a Universal Standard for Conflicts Disclosures Case Comments John R Crook, Kimberly-Clark Dutch Holdings, BV, Kimberly-Clark SLU, and Kimberly-Clark BVBA v Venezuela Andrés Mazuera, Glencore v Colombia: A Tale of Legally Coerced Evidence Patrick Leonard, Patrick Costello v the Government of Ireland, Ireland and the Attorney General: Obstacles to the Ratification of CETA in the Irish… [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 8:14 am by MOTP
Clark, for Warren Gattenby, Appellant.On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. [read post]
  Lord Clarke repeated a useful quotation of Longmore LJ from Barclays Bank plc v HHY Luxembourg SARL [2010] EWCA Civ 1248: “If a clause is capable of two meanings…it is quite possible that neither meaning will flout common sense. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:58 am by GUY BLACKWOOD QC, QUADRANT CHAMBERS
In so doing: Lord Clarke recorded that by Article 3 of UCP 600, “braches of a bank in different countries are considered to be separate banks”, with the consequence that Lord Neuberger said of the decision in Power Curber, “such unreasoned distinctions do the common law, and in particular commercial law, no favours” (para 125). [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:22 am
A recent case in point is the British Columbia Court of Appeal decision in Doucette v. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 1:25 pm
Clark, 491 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), and company safety standards (Steinberg v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 11:10 am by admin
Bank of America before the Eighth Judicial District Court of Clark County, Nevada. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:11 pm by Glenn Reynolds
UPDATE: Missouri reader Stephen Clark writes: Carnahan v Blunt is going to be an interesting race. [read post]
25 May 2018, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland) was heard on 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Lawfare, Anthony Bellia and Bradford Clark, the authors of scholarship cited by Justice Neil Gorsuch during last week’s oral argument in Jesner v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am by Ayesha Christie, Matrix
In contrast, Lord Kerr’s dissenting judgment adopts a far more structured approach to proportionality, closely analysing the four questions identified by Lord Reed in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700, with particular emphasis on the rational connection between the interference and the legislative objective and the “least intrusive means” test [21]. [read post]