Search for: "Clark v. Burden" Results 1 - 20 of 678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Then the solidly and increasingly conservative George Sutherland replaced the progressive John Clark, an event that proved to be “a significant turning point” (39) and “steered the Court sharply to the right” (45). [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Under Bruen, the government has the burden to establish modern regulation of firearms are consistent with h [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
” Senators endorsed Clark’s understanding the betraying the oath of office was the lynchpin of Section Three disqualification. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 4:02 pm by jonathanturley
  The panel declared that AR-15s are not protected by the Second Amendment in overturning the preliminary injunction win Barnett v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm by Blair & Kim, PLLC
The mother wanted to move out of state to be closer to her family, but remained in Clark County to respond to the petition. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 3:03 pm by Larry
In a 1984 decision called Jarvis Clark Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
Practically speaking, how does a defendant meet their burden of proof? [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm by Josh Blackman
I have now had a chance to read the entire 45-page indictment in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”Under Batson, once the defendant makes a showing that race was a possible reason potential jurors were excluded, the burden shifts to the state to come forward with a race-neutral explanation for the exclusion. [read post]