Search for: "Clark v. Fair" Results 81 - 100 of 825
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Clark’s conduct in late 2020 and early 2021 was also the focus of a hearing by the House committee probing the January 6 attack on the U.S. [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm by Frank Cranmer
 As we noted in an earlier post, however, in Dean Martyn Percy v The Dean & Chapter of the Cathedral Church of Christ in Oxford of the Foundation of King Henry VIII [2020] UKET 3310878/2019, Employment Judge Andrew Clarke QC concluded at a preliminary hearing that Dean Percy was an employee for the purposes of s. 83(2)(a) of the Equality Act 2010, though not an employee of the Crown. [read post]
17 May 2022, 1:28 am by INFORRM
The law on this was considered by the Supreme Court in Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd v Dring (Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK) [2019] UKSC 38; [2020] AC 629; [2019] WLR(D) 462 (29 July 2019), when it reiterated that (a) the civil courts have power under the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR r 5.4C(2)) to disclose documents held by the court to a non-party, if used or disclosed at or for the trial; and (b) the more senior courts (ie High Court and above) have power under their… [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 2:36 pm by Aaron Moss
Clark Asay and his team analyzed fair use opinions between 1991 (the year after Judge Leval first coined the term “transformative use”) and 2017. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 10:35 am by Brandon W. Clark
Clark is the Chair of the Copyright, Entertainment, and Media Law Practice Group at McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:04 am
  Attorney MalpracticeIn the case of Clark v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Equitable estoppel, by contrast, is a doctrine imposed as a matter of fairness that "preclude[s] a person from asserting a right after having led another to form the reasonable belief that the right would not be asserted, and loss or prejudice to the other would result if the right were asserted" (Matter of Shondel J. v Mark D., 7 NY3d 320, 326 [2006]). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Equitable estoppel, by contrast, is a doctrine imposed as a matter of fairness that "preclude[s] a person from asserting a right after having led another to form the reasonable belief that the right would not be asserted, and loss or prejudice to the other would result if the right were asserted" (Matter of Shondel J. v Mark D., 7 NY3d 320, 326 [2006]). [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Doctor Rachel Clarke reported the tweet to the police and has threatened to sue Moran for defamation. [read post]