Search for: "Clark v. Floyd" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
” Mark Esper, Trump’s former defense secretary, has warned of “more … hyper-aggressive behavior” by Trump if he takes office, recounting when Trump asked if demonstrators gathering around the White House following the death of George Floyd could be shot. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
In the case of Fairhurst v Woodard [pdf] in the Oxford County Court, Judge Melissa Clarke held that security cameras and a Ring doorbell “unjustifiably invaded” the privacy of a neighbour, broke data laws and contributed to harassment. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm by Adam Faderewski
The State Bar of Texas’ Membership Department was informed in February and March 2021 of the deaths of these members. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
Trump addressed the nation in response to the death of George Floyd, warning that “those who threaten innocent life and property will be arrested, detained, and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:19 pm by Erin Napoleon
” The bill also calls for the removal of the statues of white supremacists Charles Aycock, John Calhoun, and James Clarke. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:14 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Press 2008); Charles Lane, The Day Freedom Died: The Colfax Massacre, the Supreme Court, and the Betrayal of Reconstruction (Henry Holt & Company 2008); and United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Scotland The Court of Session (Lord Clark) handed down judgment in the case of Wildcat Haven Enterprises v Wightman [2020] Scot CS CSOH 30. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 1:30 am
Author David Castor Licence CCO 1.0 Source Wikipedia Royal Courts of Justice Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Lewison, Floyd and Hamblin) Addlesee and others v Dentons Europe LLP [2019] EWCA Civ 1600 (2 Oct 2019) This was an appeal against Master Clark's refusal to order disclosure of certain documents on the grounds that they were privileged. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
FIL Ltd v Fidelis Underwriting [2018] EWHC 1097, High Court of England and Wales (May 2018)The use of FIDELIS for specialty insurance and reinsurance services does not infringe FIDELITY for financial services, holds Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]