Search for: "Clark v. Floyd"
Results 21 - 40
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2010, 9:20 pm
(77) Malcom Floyd: If V-Jax ends up on a 10 game hold out or being traded to Seattle, Floyd becomes Rivers # 1 WR. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
” The facts of Irvin v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Kitchin LJ was supported by Floyd LJ and Sir Geoffrey Vos, both of wh [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:14 pm
Press 2008); Charles Lane, The Day Freedom Died: The Colfax Massacre, the Supreme Court, and the Betrayal of Reconstruction (Henry Holt & Company 2008); and United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(Class 46) United Kingdom EWCA: Unlicensed imprecision: Pink Floyd v EMI Records (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Just sue them! [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am
Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
It is here - the Supreme Court's decision in Eli Lilly v Actavis UK [2017] UKSC 48. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:59 am
Today the court handed down its reasons for those conclusions, the unanimous decision being given by its President, Lord Neuberger, and the other Supreme Court justices, Lords Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Hodge, agreeing with it. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
Scotland The Court of Session (Lord Clark) handed down judgment in the case of Wildcat Haven Enterprises v Wightman [2020] Scot CS CSOH 30. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 9:16 am
Second, in Pearson v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 8:27 am
Clark, Thurgood Marshall: Warrior at the Bar, Rebel on the Bench (1994) Carl T. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:02 pm
The Ninth Circuit, in Fordyce v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
Speaking will be Mr Justice Floyd, Daniel Alexander QC, and Professor Rochelle Dreyfuss on issues relating to the patentability of products and the scope of protection which patents confer on products. [read post]
3 May 2018, 12:28 pm
Parks v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
In the case of Fairhurst v Woodard [pdf] in the Oxford County Court, Judge Melissa Clarke held that security cameras and a Ring doorbell “unjustifiably invaded” the privacy of a neighbour, broke data laws and contributed to harassment. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:43 pm
Floyd County Includes the cities of Cave Spring and Rome. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am
A 1978 Supreme Court case, Monell v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:54 am
This is the second in a series, discussing the two new Bills proposed in Congress to deal with online pirates and counterfeiters. [read post]
