Search for: "Clark v. Irvin"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2012, 9:42 am
by Clark Taylor In Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
Dayton, University of Connecticut, and Sharon V. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:32 am
Today’s judgment from the European Court in Al-Khawaja & Tahery v UK vindicates, at least in part, Lord Irvine’s claim that such assertiveness might succeed in influencing the Strasbourg court. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 2:13 am
En King v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:12 am
Prior to Myriad, the US Supreme Court held in Mayo v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Again, focusing just on the existing USNWR “top 50” for now:POTENTIAL LOSERS, PEER CHANGE:UC-Irvine (20 v. 37)Washington (36 v. 49)Colorado (36 v. 49)UC-Davis (24 v. 37)Wisconsin (31 v. 43)Boston College (27 v. 37)Emory (20 v. 30)There are a few others in the middle of some interest, because near the top smaller variations matter more. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Again, focusing just on the existing USNWR “top 50” for now:POTENTIAL LOSERS, PEER CHANGE:UC-Irvine (20 v. 37)Washington (36 v. 49)Colorado (36 v. 49)UC-Davis (24 v. 37)Wisconsin (31 v. 43)Boston College (27 v. 37)Emory (20 v. 30)There are a few others in the middle of some interest, because near the top smaller variations matter more. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
There being two legitimate aims, the next question was whether the restriction was proportionate to them; the means chosen to achieve those aim must (a) be rationally connected to the objective and not be arbitrary, unfair or based on irrational considerations, (b) impair the right as little as possible, and (c) be such that their effects on rights are proportional to the objective … (Murphy v IRTC [46] (Barrington J), following Heaney v Ireland [1994] 3 IR… [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:55 pm
Supreme Court case Fisher v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 4:45 pm
Escaping the American Rule: Shen Valley Masonry v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
Gama Endustri Tesisleri Imalat Montaj AS v Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment [2005] IEHC 119 (22 April 2005) (Kelly J), Cogley v Radio Telifís Eireann [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005) (Clarke J) and Murray v Newsgroup Newspapers [2010] IEHC 248 (Irvine J) are all to similar effect. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:51 pm
Ben Roethslisberger's Sexual Assault Accusations Not Good for Business - Los Angeles attorney Jeffrey Kravitz of Fox Rothschild on the firm's Sports Law Scoreboard Another Assistant Manager Case: The Time Bomb Keeps Exploding - New Jersey lawyer Mark Tabakman of Fox Rothschild in their Wage & Hour - Development & Highlights Blog American Canyon Settles Eminent Domain Lawsuit for Napa County Property - Irvine attorney Brad Kuhn of Nossaman on the firm's… [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 5:02 pm
Apple v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am
Writing for the National Review Online’s Bench Memos blog, Clark Neily – who served as co-counsel to the plaintiffs in District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
The leading case on false endorsement is Irvine v Talksport [2002] FSR 60, in which Eddie Irvine successfully argued passing off when Talksport used his image for an advertising campaign. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 2:09 pm
Supreme Court made its landmark decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 1:36 pm
Clarke School of Law and former dean of the Thurgood Marshall School of Law at Texas Southern University. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
By 5-4 decision, the Supreme yesterday put an end to consumer class actions in AT&T v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
I then spot checked to clean up situations where the “William” v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:24 pm
I then spot checked to clean up situations where the “William” v. [read post]
