Search for: "Clark v. STRAIN" Results 21 - 40 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2014, 1:56 am
The yoghurt case in question is Fage UK Ltd & Another v Chobani UK Ltd & Another [the decision of Briggs J at trial is at [2013] EWHC 630 (Ch), noted by the IPKat here; the appeal decision, at [2014] EWCA Civ 5, featuring Lords Justices Lewison, Kitchin and Longmore, is noted by the IPKat here]. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:42 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Wasserman ("[T]his paper draws on novel patent-processing data and presents evidence suggesting that the PTO will attempt to maintain as much aggregate application throughput as it can during times of financial strain by prioritizing the examination of applications within those technologies that cost the PTO the least to review.")Enabling Patentless Innovation, by Clark D. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:40 pm by Bill Marler
Further laboratory testing is underway to determine whether the E. coli strain in the product matched the strain causing the outbreak. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 3:00 am by Katharine Alexander, Olswang LLP
The Supreme Court appeal On 13 January 2015, the appeal was heard before Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 6:05 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The three-step Coco v AN Clark test was applied to the dispute. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
O’Brien[v] might have been caused by his worry that aggressive judicial patrolling of congressional motivation or of incidental effects on speech would produce too many challenges and thus strain judicial capacity, as Coan posits, but it might instead have been the product of an aversion to non-linguistic anti-war protests, an aversion that would explain Warren’s dissent in Street v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Donald Clarke looks at Animal Science Products v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:06 am by Maria Roche
” The Court went on to consider the formula in  R v Hemsley [2010] EWCA Crim 225, which restricts internet use to “job search, study, work, lawful recreation and purchases”. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:07 pm by Michael Douglas
  Nevertheless, it is not a strain of language to refer to an award being enforced by way of execution. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:07 pm by Michael Douglas
  Nevertheless, it is not a strain of language to refer to an award being enforced by way of execution. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:07 pm by Michael Douglas
  Nevertheless, it is not a strain of language to refer to an award being enforced by way of execution. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
  Lord Kerr SCJ then went on to set out how the Court should approach its determination of meaning, citing Sir Anthony Clarke MR’s well-known guidance in Jeynes v News Magazines Ltd & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 130:- “The governing principle is reasonableness. (2) The hypothetical reasonable reader is not naïve, but he is not unduly suspicious. [read post]