Search for: "Clark v. Secretary of Health and Human Services"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
In American Health Care Association v. [read post]
Business and criminal law, health care reform, and chicken mole poblano and rosemary mashed potatoes
22 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm
CLARK, Petitioner, v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am
, by Law and Lawyers Maya the cat, by the Free Movement blog Law Review on #Catflapgate: As the Cheshire Cat in Alice in Wonderland said…”We’re all mad here”, by CharonQC Clarke ‘regrets’ accusing May of laughable attack on Human Rights Act, by the Guardian Clarke hits out at ‘childish remarks’, by This is Nottingham “I want to scrap the Human Rights Act but Clegg won’t let me” [updated], by the UK… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:15 pm
Sandra Eskin Deputy Under Secretary for Food Safety Food Safety and Inspection Service 331-E Jamie Whitten Federal Bldg. 1400 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20250 Docket Clerk U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 10:21 am
Reference was made to various cases, including Morison v Moat (1861) 68 ER 492, where Turner VC held that “the Court fastens the obligation on the conscience of the party, and enforces it against him”, and Smith Kline & French Laboratories v Secretary, Department of Community Services and Health (1990) 17 IPR 545, where Gummow J stated that “an obligation of conscience is to respect the confidence, not merely to refrain from causing… [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
HHJ Pelling QC, referring to the case of Crofton v National Health Service Litigation Authority [2007] EWCA Civ 71 , emphasised that he was not expressing any view as to the social and economic expediency of requiring a tortfeasor or his insurer to pay for the services that have or will be provided by the NHS. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company, heard 18 – 20 July 2011. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
On Thursday 7 June, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 6:52 am
Secretaries v Board of Educ. of Scarsdale Union Free School Dist. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
“The Secretary of Health and Human Services is not a State; so an Exchange established by the Secretary is not an Exchange established by the State; so people who buy insurance through such an Exchange get no money. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 7:03 am
IN THE COURTS: Dean (Zain Taj) v Lord Advocate: the Supreme Court has ruled that the prison conditions in Taiwan are such that any extradition would breach the Human Rights Convention. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
On 1 November, J Johnson handed down judgement of preliminary issues in the case of Clarke v Guardian [2023] EWHC 2734 (KB). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
Secretary of Health and Human Services; Clark v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:05 pm
Sandra Eskin Deputy Under Secretary for Food Safety Food Safety and Inspection Service 331-E Jamie Whitten Federal Bldg. 1400 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20250 Docket Clerk U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Richard Clarke, commander of Special Operations Command; and Gen. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
Circuit’s al-Bihani v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
After he finished his military service, he finished law school, clerked for Justice Tom Clark, and then joined Steptoe & Johnson. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
Clause 3 of the bill states that a person will be committing an offence if they engage in conduct with the intention that such conduct is likely to materially assist a foreign intelligence service in carrying out UK-related activities. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-5163 September 13, 2011 Judge: Griffith Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Health Law, Public Benefits In a 2008 administrative appeal, the Secretary of Health and Human Services ruled that a Medicare beneficiary enrolled in Medicare Part C still qualified as a person "entitled to benefits" under Medicare Part A. [read post]
