Search for: "Clark v. State Election Bd." Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
Avion Resources Ltd., defendants-respondents Subscription Required APPELLATE DIVISIONFIRST DEPARTMENTBanking Attachment Order's Vacatur Upheld; State Court Lacked Power to Order Transfer Bringing Funds Into State NEW YORK COUNTYReal Property Sponsor of Offering Plan Can Collect Storage Bin License Fees From Owners Residential Committee of the Bd. of Managers of the Sycamore v. 250 E. 30th St. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:38 am by Eugene Volokh
”[10] It is justified by the federal Elections Clause power, aimed at protecting federal elections, and not by any Fourteenth Amendment Enforcement Clause power.[11] Nor does it extend as far as the First Amendment does: It is limited to support or advocacy of the election of federal candidates, not speech on other matters. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
Perry introduced Clark to Trump, and together they had a shared goal: “to enlist Clark to reverse the Department of Justice’s findings regarding the election and help overturn the election outcome” (Jan. 6th final report). [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Nor was it clear that data on time spent and hourly rates was required to prove up attorneys fees when the attorney had not elected to use the lodestar-method to substantiate the reasonableness of the amount of fees sought under other fee-shifting statutes. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:12 am
As the Court stated in Garfinkel v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:20 am
" U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 23, 2008 Clark v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, 28% of online adults in the United States use LinkedIn, another website covered by § 14-202.5. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, 28% of online adults in the United States use LinkedIn, another website covered by § 14-202.5. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am by Kevin Kaufman
Outline of the Proposal Maryland lawmakers were looking for revenue, but the original inspiration for S.B. 2 was never about revenue; it was a proposal for the punitive federal taxation of targeted advertising as a response to perceived exploitation of customer data and invasions of privacy, especially when used nefariously to influence U.S. politics or elections. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation & Parole, No. 05-4200 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 suit brought by an anonymous plaintiff seeking declaratory and injunctive relief from aspects of Pennsylvania's Registration of Sexual Offenders Act, or Megan's Law, a judgment finding that the treatment of out-of-state offenders under the law violates the Equal Protection Clause is affirmed where: 1) although Pennsylvania's interest in protecting its citizens from sexually… [read post]