Search for: "Clarke v. Public Employee Union 1"
Results 1 - 20
of 76
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am
Art, Music and Copyright On 24 January 2024, HHJ Clarke handed down judgement in the case of Thatchers Cider Company Limited v Aldi Stores Limited [2024] EWHC 88 (IPEC). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
IPSO 12126-22 Nash, Waugh and The Lighthouse Group v The Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2023), 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation 09772-23 Peet v Sunday People, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 14431-23 Resolution Statement Booley v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 16942-23 Hood v… [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
” IPSO 10284-22 Hodgson v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 14301-22 Clews v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 00740-23 A woman v Birminghammail.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation 09808-23 Boyle v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after… [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
On 19 and 20 June 2023 Steyn J heard the harassment case of Clarke v Rose. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
An employer that is required to hire employees regardless of union membership has no First Amendment right to refuse to hire union members on the grounds that it is boycotting the union. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
The employee's union demanded the employer's action be submitted to arbitration.The arbitrator ruled in favor of the employee organization, directing the employee's reinstatement with back salary and benefits. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
The employee's union demanded the employer's action be submitted to arbitration.The arbitrator ruled in favor of the employee organization, directing the employee's reinstatement with back salary and benefits. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
Osborne Clarke, TechMonitor, FinTech Times, Mishcon de Reya, DLA Piper, the Privacy and Information Law Blog and the Data Protection Report have more information. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
He was also involved in the effort to install as acting attorney general Jeffrey Clark, who backed plans to block Biden from taking office. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
This question had been unsettled earlier, see, e.g., Clark v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:42 am
The office of Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Two of the companies would donate more than $1 million to Republican campaigns after getting those deals. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Wade, Tucker Carlson took to the airwaves to rail against companies that would pay for employees’ abortion-travel costs. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Petitioner was employed, as a probationary employee, by respondent County of Schoharie Department of Public Works (hereinafter DPW) from May 2017 to April 2018. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Petitioner was employed, as a probationary employee, by respondent County of Schoharie Department of Public Works (hereinafter DPW) from May 2017 to April 2018. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
As to demand No. 1, respondent explained that there were 234 parcels in Vacation Village and asked Aron to clarify whether he was requesting a search of all employee records for responsive documents or only a search of the records maintained by the Assessor's Office. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
As to demand No. 1, respondent explained that there were 234 parcels in Vacation Village and asked Aron to clarify whether he was requesting a search of all employee records for responsive documents or only a search of the records maintained by the Assessor's Office. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm
(i) Article 3(1) Processing in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller or a processor in the Union The Claimant failed to demonstrate that the First Defendant had the necessary “stable arrangements” in the UK to constitute an “establishment” for the purposes of Article 3(1), even though the Claimant needed only to establish a real (as opposed to fanciful) prospect of success at the service out stage. [read post]
