Search for: "Clarke v. Public Employee Union 1"
Results 21 - 40
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Petitioner was employed, as a probationary employee, by respondent County of Schoharie Department of Public Works (hereinafter DPW) from May 2017 to April 2018. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 5:22 am
Borough of Kutztown, 455 F.3d 225, 241 (3d Cir. 2006), which created a three-factor test: A public employee’s statement is protected activity when (1) in making it, the employee spoke as a citizen, (2) the statement involved a matter of public concern, and (3) the government employer did not have an adequate justification for treating the employee differently from any other member of the general public as a result of the statement… [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:05 pm
Rules of Evidence, comment 1 on N.J.R.E. 803(c)(6)(2007). [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:05 pm
Union Fire Ins. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 9:49 am
Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1317 v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:17 am
" In the introduction to the MOJ's Guidance, Kenneth Clarke, U.K. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:07 am
Pantzer, 141 N.J. 292, 317–19 and 335–45 (1995), Furst v Einstein Moomjy, Inc., 182 N.J. 1, 20–24 (2004). [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:08 am
Div. 1997); and the Conscientious Employee Protection Act, N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 to -14, Singer v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
This question had been unsettled earlier, see, e.g., Clark v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 4:21 am
1. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
Matter of Burke v Bowen, 40 NY2d 264, 266-267 [1976]; cf. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
Affirming the administrative law judge's conclusions, the Board held that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act by failing to provide Amalgamated Transit Local 1637 with information it requested concerning nonbargaining unit persons performing bargaining work, employees who no longer worked on their bids, and forced overtime work; Section 8(a)(2) and (1) by dealing with a labor organization other than Local 1637 in processing employee… [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:13 pm
It was the Union soldiers who arrived in Galveston about three months after Robert E. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 6:53 am
In NLRB v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
§§ 991, 994, and 995(a)(1). 3. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
On 19 and 20 June 2023 Steyn J heard the harassment case of Clarke v Rose. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
New Zealand On 12 December 2019 Clark J handed down judgment in the defamation and privacy case of Driver v Radio New Zealand Limited [2019] NZHC 3275. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 4:46 pm
http://j.st/GjM Retired Employees Assoc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:41 pm
In the context of public employee unions, some people have complained that the unions are funded by taxpayer-supported salaries, and that these unions merely recycle those dollars to advance self-interested objectives that many taxpayers oppose. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
