Search for: "Clarkson v. Wright" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The editor of The Spectator has criticised the press regulator IPSO for upholding the complaint against The Sun over the Jeremy Clarkson column about Meghan Markle. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
The press complaints handler IPSO has published its ruling on Jeremy Clarkson’s article in The Sun attacking Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, which prompted an unprecedented 25,100 complaints. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
On 20 December 2022, Chamberlain J heard costs applications in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm by Zuri Blackmon
The King Law Reporter will be available on Fastcase.com for free through February 2018. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:08 am by Eleanor Winslet
Summary The EAT has issued a decision in the well-known and long-running retirement case of Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes, which dealt with the question: Was the retirement age of 65 PROPORTIONATE to achieve the firm’s stated aims of retention of staff and workforce planning? [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:48 am by Aileen McColgan, Matrix.
On 25 April 2012 the Supreme Court handed down two major judgments on age discrimination: Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2012] UKSC 15 and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes [2012] UKSC 16. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:05 am by Ruth Bonino
   A recent decision of the Supreme Court in Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership) indicates that although it may be technically possible to justify a retirement age, an employer will be taking a big risk in attempting to do so (the Seldon case concerned a partnership but the same principles will apply in an employment case). [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:01 am by Michael Scutt
  In this latest podcast I’m joined by Philip Henson, Partner at Bargate Murray Solicitors to chew over the new and proposed reforms to employment law and the case of Seldon v Clarkson, Wright & Jakes. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:04 am by Staci Zaretsky
Clarkson Wright & Jakes, Sex, Sex Scandals, Sexting, St. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:10 am by tracey
Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes (Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills and another intervening); [2012] UKSC 16;  [2012] WLR (D)  124 “A rule providing for the compulsory retirement at 65 of partners in a firm of solicitors could be justified as a means of achieving legitimate aims relating to recruitment and promotions within the firm. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:01 am by sally
Supreme Court Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2012] UKSC 15 (25 April 2012) Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership) [2012] UKSC 16 (25 April 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) E, R v [2012] EWCA Crim 791 (25 April 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Swain Mason & Ors v Mills & Reeve (a firm) [2012] EWCA Civ 498 (23 April 2012) Brightsea UK Ltd v Drachs Investments No 3 Ltd [2012] EWCA… [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:15 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
On appeal from: [2010] EWCA Civ 899 Concerns the scope for justifying direct discrimination on the ground of age and in particular a mandatory retirement age contained within a partnership agreement. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:34 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
The following judgments will be handed down by the Supreme Court on Wednesday 25 April 2012: Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership). [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:50 am by Laura Sandwell
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:57 am by Laura Sandwell
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:26 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]